Back to Home
Home >> Biotechnology /Genomics and Intellectual Property >> Intellectual Property Rights - IPRs for Plant Breeding >> TRIPS 'sui generis' and Other International Treaties
Back to Home

TRIPS 'sui generis' and Other International Treaties
Any sui generis system should be compatible with the relevant obligations and principles laid down in other international instruments.

These instruments include Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the ILO Convention. Soft law is also contained in some other instruments including Rio Declaration Agenda 21, FAO's International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources (IUPGR), the UNESCO/ WIPO Model Provisions for National Laws on the Protection of Expression of Folklore and the Draft Declaration on Indigenous Rights (DDIR). In view of this, while formulating the sui generis system, member states need to ensure that the sui generis system, developed in accordance with TRIPS, should be supportive of and does not run counter to the objectives and principles laid down in these international instruments.

Compulsory licensing
According to Article 31 of the TRIPS Agreement, under certain conditions, member states in their sui generis systems may allow any body, the use of subject matter of a patent without the authorization of the right holder. This provision is described as 'compulsory licensing'. However, this may be allowed only 'to prevent the abuses, which might result from the exercise of the exclusive rights' {Art. 2 (1) of TRIPS and Article SA (2) of Paris Convention}.

However, Article 31 of TRIPS sets out the following conditions, under which compulsory licences may be granted: (i) each case shall be considered on its individual merits; (ii) prior to granting compulsory licence, negotiations for voluntary licence shall take place;

(iii) scope and duration of compulsory licence shall be limited and it will not be an exclusive right; (iv) compulsory licence shall not be transferable and shall be granted only for domestic market; (v) compulsory licence shall be terminated, when the reasons for granting the same no longer exist; (vi) the right holder will be adequately compensated; (vii) validity of such licence and the adequacy of compensation shall be subject to judicial review.

Compulsory licences may be needed in developing countries, if patented products are imported or else if there is a likelihood of exploitation due to monopoly. In the PVP and FRA draft prepared by Indian Government, a provision for compulsory licence has been made and approved, although it was resisted earlier by the seed industry.