Back to Home
Home >> Enzyme Technology >> Comparison of the Various Features of the Different Immobilization Systems
Back to Home

Comparison of the Various Features of the Different Immobilization Systems

Feature Immobillization System
  Adsorption Covealent binding Entrapment Membrane confinement

Matrices (examples)

Ion-exchange matrices, clays, glasses, etc.

Sepharose, cellulose, acrylamide, etc.

Acrylamide, cellulose acetate, etc.

Semipermeable membranes, e.g. hollow-fibers, lipsomes, etc.

Preparation Simple Difficult Difficult Simple
Immobilization mechanism Hydrophobic effects, salt links Covalent bonds Trapping in Gel/fibre; even covalent bonds Confinement in a semipermeable membrane
Binding force Variable Strong Weak Strong
Enzyme loading High (Ca. 19/9 matrix) Small (Ca. 0.02 gig matrix) - -

Enzyme leakage during use

Yes

No Yes No
Applicability Wide

Selective

Wide Very wide
Problems during operation High Low High High
Matrix effects on enzyme Yes Yes Yes No
Diffusional barriers * Absent Absent Large Large
Protection from microbial attack No No Yes Yes
Cost Low High Moderate High