Back to Home
Home >>Plant Biotechnology >> Isolation of Somoclonal Variation
Back to Home

Isolation of Somoclonal Variation- Mutants for several traits can be far more easily isolated from cell cultures than from whole plant populations. This is because a large number of cells, say, 106-109 cells, can be easily and effectively screened for mutant traits. Screening of as many plants would be very difficult, ordinarily impossible.

Mutants can be effectively selected for disease resistance, improvement of nutritional quality, adaptation of plants to stress conditions, e.g., saline soils, low temperature, toxic metals (e.g., aluminium), resistance to herbicides and to increase the biosynthesis of plant products used for medicinal or industrial purposes.

The various approaches for isolation of somaclonal variants can be categorised as
(i) screening and
(ii) cell selection.
Screening. It involves the observation of a large number of cells or regenerated plants for the detection of variant individuals. This approach is the only feasible technique for the isolation of mutants for yield and yield traits; in general, R, progeny (progeny of regenerated, Ro, plants) are scored for the identification of variant plants, and their R2 progeny lines are evaluated for confirmation . Screening has been profitably and widely employed for the isolation of cell clones that produce higher quantities of certain biochemicals.

Cell Selection. In the cell selection approach, a suitable selection pressure is applied, which permits the preferential survival/growth of variant cells only. Some examples of cell selection are selection of cells resistant to various toxins, herbicides, high salt concentration, etc. When the selection pressure allows only the mutant cells to survive or divide, it is called positive selection.

On the other hand, in the case of negative selection, the wild type cells divide normally and, therefore, are killed by a counterselection agent, e.g., 5 BUdR or arsenate; the mutant cells are unable to divide as a result of which they escape the counterselection agent.

These cells are subsequently rescued by removal of the counterselection agent. Negative selection approach is utilized for the isolation of auxotrophic mutants.
The positive selection approach may be further subdivided into four categories:
(i) direct selection,
(ii) rescue method,
(iii) stepwise selection and
(iv) double selection.

In direct selection, the cells resistant to the selection pressure survive and divide to form colonies; the wild type cells are killed by the selection agent. This is the most common selection method; it is used for the isolation of cells resistant to toxins (produced by pathogens), herbicides, elevated salt concentration, antibiotics, amino acid analogues, etc.

In the rescue method, the wild type cells are killed by the selection agent, while the variant cells remain alive but, usually, do not divide due to the unfavourable environment. The selection agent is then removed to recover the variant cells. This approach has been used to recover low temperature and aluminium resistant variant cells.

The selection pressure, e.g., salt concentration, may be gradually increased from a relatively low level to the cytotoxic level; the resistant clones isolated at each stage are subjected to the higher selection pressure. Such a selection approach is called stepwise selection.

It may often favour gene amplification (which is unstable) or mutations in the organelle DNA. In some cases, it may be feasible to select for survival and/or growth on one hand and some other feature reflecting resistance to the selection pressure on the other; this is called double selection.

An example of double selection is the selection for resistance to streptomycin, which inhibits chlorophyll development in cultured cells. The selection was based on cell survival and colony formation in the presence of streptomycin (one feature) as well as for the development of green colour in these colonies (second feature).